Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5248 13
Original file (NR5248 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOSRE FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 ยง. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1007

ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NRO5248-13
5 August 2014

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 Rugust .
2014, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
-accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. pocument.ary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command (NPC)
memo 5420 PERS g36/076 of 12 June 2014, a copy of which was provided
to you on 26 June 2014, and is being provided to you now.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error OF injustice. In
this connection, the Board concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitied to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
vegard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when

. applying for 4 correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

, Sincerely,
RS

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1821 14

    Original file (NR1821 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered yout application on 4 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable stacutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was snsufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3184 14

    Original file (NR3184 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yegulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1288 14

    Original file (NR1288 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your navai record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1752 14

    Original file (NR1752 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minority contract is defined as an sndividual who, upon entry into the U.S armed Services, is 17 years old (a minority) and is willing to reenlist after their initial contract expires. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1266 14

    Original file (NR1266 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO1266-14 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR865 14

    Original file (NR865 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board: Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8235 13

    Original file (NR8235 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13

    Original file (NR3788 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0215 14

    Original file (NR0215 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) 5420 Ser 91/026 of 5 Mar 2014, a Copy of which was provided to you on i May 2014, and which is now enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NROO215-14 official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7111 13

    Original file (NR7111 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were also provided an opportunity to respond within 30 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.